◉ SAP Sustainable AI ProtocolInvisible by default · transparent on demand · actionable by choice
EXPERIMENTAL · LOCAL-ONLY DEMONSTRATION

What if every AI task had a better way?

Sustainability includes the planet, the people using intelligence, and the long-term economics of computing. This sandbox lets you compare available execution paths rather than assuming that local or cloud AI always wins.

Illustrative scenarios only. No AI requests are executed. Quality, cost and energy values below are fictional examples for testing the decision logic—not real benchmarks, provider measurements, or carbon claims. This page does not transmit or store your choices.

1 · Define what matters

Preferred execution approach

Quality is an illustrative external evaluation score, not a promise that an actual model would meet it.

2 · Compare possible paths

3 · See why

SAP's experimental core accepts declared requirements, evidence-labeled metrics, and available execution options. It returns an explainable choice, flags incomplete measurements, and never treats unknown energy use as zero.

Inspect the machine-readable plan
Inspect the draft execution receipt

Planned does not mean executed; executed does not mean verified. SAP Core does not independently measure AI workloads.

What this demonstrates—and what it doesn't

Planet: compare available environmental evidence, with explicit uncertainty.

People: preserve a local-only choice and the ability to see how a decision was made.

Economics: compare known operating costs without claiming universal savings.

This is a voluntary reference design. An AI platform must integrate the core into its actual model and tool execution path before these preferences can affect real behavior.

Read the original SAP documentation ↗ · Source code ↗